Posts

Showing posts from May, 2022

Decision Factors to choose in between NVDS & CVDS during NSX-T deployments

Image
Decision Factors to choose in between NVDS & CVDS            - Prashant Pandey, VCAP-NV During NSX-T deployment, while preparing Transport nodes we have an option to choose between  NVDS (virtual switch dedicated to NSX tasks) & VDS (existing virtual switch used to manage vCenter environment) There are few design decisions which I have tried to consolidate and capture for easy reference. Decision Factors to choose N-VDS or Converge VDS. N-VDS Converge VDS Supports older version of vSphere, prior to 7.0 Requires vSphere 7.0 or more. Requires free pNics for uplinks No free pNics are required , can use original VDS uplinks only. Can only be managed in NSX and not in vCenter. Can be centralized managed in vCenter. Available with older version of NSX-T, prior to 3.0 Available with NSX-T 3.0 onwards ...

NSX-v to NSX-T workload migration with Network Coexistence via L2Bridge

Image
NSX-v to NSX-T workload migration with Network Co-existence - L2Bridging - Prashant Pandey , VCAP-NV   Use case -L2bridge is one of major use-case of workload migration from NSX-v to NSX-T along with network co-existence. Summary - There are mainly 3 use-cases for the workload migration from NSX-v to NSX-T . 1. Subnet based Migration - Shut one subnet at NSX-v  and add & advertise the same from NSX-T Pros - Easy to migrate, no addition VLAN requirement at physical network. Cons – No flexibility at Application level migration, it has be entire subnet in one go, might not be feasible in most of the production environment.   2. Network Co-existence with VMware HCX tool – Supports Network stretch with L2E feature. Pros – Network Co-existence can be achieved with ease. Cons – Separate license requires, includes extra cost.   3. Network Co-existence with L2Bridging - Supports Network stretch with layer 2 bridging feature. Pros – Netwo...